CGL delayed again , left 28 lakh dreams waiting
Share
        
      
          
        
        
        Once more, more than 28 lakh persons seeking for government jobs have had their goals put on hold. Formally postponed to the first week of September because of “unavoidable administrative reasons,” the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) is the very much anticipated Combined Graduate Level (CGL) Exam 2025. For kids all over the country who have spent years, if not months, getting ready, though, this news feels like just another setback among a long list of letdowns.
Originally scheduled for August, the SSC CGL exam is among the most desired and challenging to obtain recruitment examinations in the country, opening doors for a range of Group B and C positions in central government ministries and departments. Rather than studying for the exam, hundreds of thousands of candidates are feeling ever more exasperation, tiredness, and uncertainty.
Not surprising was the sudden termination. From Bihar and Uttar Pradesh to Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, student protests have recently gained increasing attention all over the nation. Dissatisfaction has grown as a result of issues including recruiting delays, inconsistencies in previous results, lack of openness, and repeated exam timetable modifications lacking sufficient notice.
With hashtags like #SSC_CGL2025 and #JusticeForStudents going trending on X (formerly Twitter), the internet has become a combat ground of voices demanding justice. Videos of calm protests, sincere requests from aspirants, and open letters written to the government abounds the internet. Arguing that every postponement pushes their objectives further off, many students say the system is playing with their future and mental well-being.
Well-known hubs for preparing for government examinations like Patna, Prayagraj, and Jaipur have seen large numbers of students take to the streets. Their simple message is “We need a fair, timely, and transparent process.” Many of these contenders have been studying for years; some have made great personal sacrifices, including giving up employment or moving far from their families, so as to focus on their academics. Every delay adds to the financial and emotional toll.
The SSC ultimately revealed the new tentative exam dates for the initial week of September as the pressure mounted. However, the announcement was succinct and lacked detailed information beyond the postponement. There were no specifics provided, no updated schedule, and no clarification on how the remainder of the recruitment process would unfold.
Some students are pleased to receive a bit more time for studying, while others feel anxious and frustrated. The unpredictability of the exam schedule impacts their broader life aspirations, turning it into more than simply a logistical challenge. Many express exhaustion from their state of fluctuating hope and despair, uncertain of whether their hard work holds any real value.
These concerns have been echoed by education advocates and coaching professionals, who are calling for significant reforms in the administration of competitive exams at a national level. They argue that every year, tens of thousands of students should not be left behind due to poor preparation or ambiguous protocols. They believe that students need a reliable and predictable testing timetable, transparency in evaluations, and equitable problem-solving processes.
Candidates are currently urged to check for updates on the official SSC website (ssc.nic.in). The commission has stated that revised dates and admission cards will soon be provided. However, it remains unclear whether this delay will influence the announcement of results or the final selection process for candidates.
As September approaches, the pressing question on everyone’s mind is: Will this exam take place, or will they face further delays?
This examination is not solely for the 28 lakh candidates who have dedicated their resources, time, and dreams to this pursuit. Given that this is a pivotal opportunity in their lives, they deserve a system that is more transparent, respectful, and, crucially, does not leave them in uncertainty.

      