CAT 2025: Mixed Difficulty Across All Slots
Share
The Common Admission Test (CAT) 2025, conducted by the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), unfolded at the same moment across the country in three places, drawing lakhs of operation applicants to one of India’s most competitive entrance examinations. As the test concluded, a clearer picture of the paper pattern, difficult situations, and scholars’ responses began to crop up, giving perceptivity into anticipated cutoffs and performance trends. With test-takers laboriously participating in memory-grounded questions across social media and educational forums, an early analysis indicates that the three places differed in difficulty, particularly in the Verbal Capability and Quantitative Aptitude sections.
The morning session (niche 1) began at 8:30 AM, and numerous scholars reported a relatively delicate paper overall. According to early feedback, the Verbal Capability and Reading Appreciation (VARC) section was slightly trickier compared to last time, largely due to thick reading passages and near answer choices in summary and conclusion-grounded questions. Reading appreciation featured lengthy passages on social geste.
, environmental studies, and philosophical themes, which needed considerable time to navigate. Applicants remarked that while the language was manageable, the nebulosity in options made the section feel time-consuming and mentally demanding.
The Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning (DILR) section in niche 1 was considered the toughest by most campaigners. Sets were smaller but heavier in computation and sense depth. Several applicants noted that the LR mystifications were intricate, taking multiple-condition filtering before arriving at a soluble frame. Traditional DILR motifs—like arrangement mystifications, bar-graph-grounded sets, and grid-grounded sense—appeared with a new twist, forcing scholars to reevaluate familiar problem types. Numerous scholars claimed they could essay only two sets with delicacy due to the complexity of constraints.
Quantitative Aptitude (QA) in niche 1, still, was rated moderate. Computation and algebra dominated the section, and the number of figure questions was smaller than anticipated. Most questions were straightforward but required abstract clarity and attention to detail. Scholars with strong fundamentals reported the QA portion as realizable, though the time pressure remained constant due to the previous difficulty in DILR.
As niche 2 commenced at 12:30 PM, the original reviews suggested notable differences compared to the morning paper. VARC in the alternate niche was perceived as easier, with shorter reading passages and lower abstract motifs. Questions on para-jumbles and para-completion were standard in structure, giving scholars further confidence in their delicacy. Numerous campaigners expressed relief that the reading appreciation questions were more direct than in niche 1, making this section the highest scoring of the three.
DILR in niche 2 remained grueling but slightly more balanced. Scholars reported that while two sets were soluble within time, the remaining sets demanded high tolerance and sharp interpretation chops. Some sets involved multi-layered sequencing, and at least one relied heavily on numerical logic, which broke down attempts. Yet, numerous applicants felt that this niche offered more openings for scoring if one chose sets wisely.
The QA section in niche 2, still, shifted towards a more delicate diapason. Applicants described the presence of several tricky algebra questions and an unanticipated emphasis on number systems. Those habituated to computation-heavy sections set themselves up to flounder to acclimate to the abstract variation. Time of operation became a pivotal factor, as the complexity of QA forced scholars to leave several questions unattempted. Numerous coaching experts assaying the feedback suggest that the QA section in niche 2 may play a crucial part in determining percentile distribution for this niche.
The final niche of the day, niche 3, held from 4:30 PM, registered mixed responses. Scholars generally described the paper as moderate overall but noted that certain portions were designedly changeable. VARC in niche 3 was neither as delicate as niche 1 nor as easy as niche 2. The reading appreciation passages were medium in length, but scholars felt the questions were subtle, taking careful reading to avoid traps. Alphabet-grounded and vocabulary-driven questions were minimal, keeping the section harmonious with recent CAT trends.
DILR in this niche saw the addition of largely logical sets, with a couple of them considered nearly unattainable under time constraints. Some applicants said they spent too much important time on a single grueling mystification before shifting sets, which affected their overall attempts. This was analogous to the pattern seen in the former two places, with DILR maintaining its character as the most demanding section of CAT 2025.
The QA section in niche 3 balanced difficulty with familiarity. Computation and algebra formed the bulk of questions, and although some problems tested deeper abstract understanding, the section was more approachable than niche 2. Scholars with strong computation speed felt confident, while those less comfortable with figures set up the section relatively gruelingly.
Throughout the day, guiding institutes and preceptors nearly covered pupil responses to collect memory-grounded questions. While the sanctioned question papers and answer keys will only be released by IIMCAT, early reconstructions reveal the dominance of logical mystification sets, moderate RCs with different themes, and a QA section that varied significantly across the three places. Applicants have formerly begun using these memory-grounded questions to estimate their raw scores and likely percentiles.
As conversations boosted online, anticipated cutoffs for the 99th percentile remain academic. Primary estimates suggest that due to the grueling DILR and shifting Quant difficulty, overall scores needed for high percentiles may be slightly lower this time. Campaigners set up comfort in knowing that normalization will ensure fairness across places.
With the test wrapped up, all eyes now turn to the sanctioned response distance, answer key, and result date. Applicants will soon admit clarity on their performance, but for now, the CAT 2025 test day stands as a testament to adaptability, strategy, and the changeable nature of one of India’s toughest entrance tests.
