Supreme Court Asks HC To Grant Relief To IIT Student
Share

The Supreme Court of India has asked the Bombay High Court to consider allowing interim relief to a visually impaired student from IIT Bombay, with an eye on the urgency created by such issues in reasonable accommodation under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The bench included Justices B.R. Gavai, Augustine George Masih, and K. Premier institution MSc Biotechnology pursuing student student Vinod Chandran issued this directive while hearing a plea submitted on behalf of the student.
The plea, described as a special leave petition, is seeking justice for the student who has been fighting to get reasonable accommodations, which are mandated under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The counsel for the student argued that such accommodations are not merely a matter of convenience but are a legal right aimed at ensuring equitable access to education for people with disabilities.
During the hearing, the bench was informed that the matter is currently pending before a division bench of the Bombay High Court and slated for a hearing on January 27, 2025. Of course, the Supreme Court observed that it was an emergent matter and has to be expediently resolved, particularly when the persons involved happen to be persons with disabilities, who are compounded with multiple challenges in respecting their rights.
The attention of the bench was brought to the fact that two other high courts had issued circulars emphasizing cases concerning the rights of persons with disabilities. The circulars gave importance to such matters as urgent and highlighted the pressing need for judicial intervention towards minimizing hardship for disabled persons. This was the precedent with which the Supreme Court agreed to acknowledge. In the present case, it stated that it would be proper if the Bombay High Court adopted an approach similar to that of the Apex Court.
Further, the Supreme Court noted that the student had approached the high court nearly a year ago in March 2024 and showed concern over the protracted pendency of the matter. Recognizing the sheer damage that delay might cause to students, especially students with disabilities, the court emphasized the requirement for at least interim relief to be given during the scheduled hearing date on January 27, thereby providing support to the student without waiting for the broader legal and procedural ramifications that will arise later.
The Supreme Court directive shows a very proactive role being played by the judiciary in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities, especially in education contexts. Institutions such as IITs do have a reputation for a high level of academic rigor, and the lack of reasonable accommodation can place severe constraints on the ability of students with disabilities to perform and succeed. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, enacted in 2016, seeks to eliminate such barriers by mandating equal opportunities and support systems for individuals with disabilities in various domains, including education.
Reasonable modifications to the physical environment, curriculum, and supplies that would provide access to such individuals to interact fully and appropriately are included within the Act. Some of these changes might include modifying the study material to be provided for students or making assistive technology available, deadline extensions, examination procedures, etc. Failure to provide these is not only an illegal act, but it sustains inequality and exclusion.
The case, therefore, sheds light on a broader issue concerning the implementation of policies by educational institutions regarding the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. Although many of these institutions have done a commendable job of fostering inclusiveness, there still are gaps in terms of ensuring students with disabilities are provided with all the support that they need. This is more critical in environments such as IITs where academic demands are high and challenging even for ordinary students.
The Supreme Court’s intervention in this case sends a strong message about the judiciary’s commitment to protecting the rights of marginalized communities. By urging the high court to prioritize the matter and consider interim relief, the apex court has reaffirmed its role as a custodian of justice for those who may otherwise be overlooked or sidelined.
This case of the student also brings into focus the element of timely judicial processes. Such issues tend to drag on for very long periods and would thus have significant effects, especially for the students, whose academic careers and other opportunities are dependent on proper accommodations. There is a stern insistence of prompt resolution, which the Supreme Court necessitates under the circumstances.
The case will, as it moves to the Bombay High Court, test the implementation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act within the education system. The outcome might set a precedent for how such cases are dealt with in the future, shaping the landscape of disability rights in India.
In this context, the Bombay High Court directive from the Supreme Court is the very first step towards all those transformations that the people with disability face within education institutions. The court’s statement that interim relief and speedy relief are essential shows a dedication to the fact that legal protection must be translated to concrete benefits for individuals. It is case that reminds us of the continued need to emphasize inclusivity and equity within the justice system and society as a whole.